4 ms·
> It's not even particularly necessary for 95% of DB Ops. Let's say I have databases full of some sensor data that need to be processed by some fancy SQL scrip
by tw1984 3y ago
> It's not even particularly necessary for 95% of DB Ops.
Let's say I have databases full of some sensor data that need to be processed by some fancy SQL scripts to crunch those numbers. Tell me how I am suppose to get that done without using floating point.
With only one FPU in mind, tell me how to parallelize such processing and full utilize all those cores.
- MichaelZuo 3y agoPicking an example from the remaining 5% does not contradict the parent's point.
- tw1984 3y agoThe point here is that it is pure stupidity on display to cut the number of FPUs to just one, the short lived history of such design is a proof for that.