3 ms·
And where did I ever say one should use SQLite over Postgres. I wasn't comparing the two. I was simply stating that SQLite is also over looked by corporate Ame
by crag 15y ago
And where did I ever say one should use SQLite over Postgres. I wasn't comparing the two.
I was simply stating that SQLite is also over looked by corporate America.
None of your reasons would impact, say, a department running their departmental "internal" blog on SQlite.
- gcp 15y agoYou stated: Why small companies get talked into running MSQL or Oracle or MySQL is beyond me. And even if (and that's a big IF) they needed more "power", there's Postgres. I'm explaining you that SQLite has big, very real limitations that any of those alternatives are a good workaround for. And as for Postgres, that's just one more argument never to use SQLite. So how can it be "underestimated"? SQLite make sense in one single situation: if you absolutely need an embedded database. A corporate blog is not one of them. SQLite isn't used much because it's limited compared to the alternatives.