4 ms·

I honestly just don't see it. I can not see anyway which anything is becoming better by this immature and ridiculous regulation. What it certainly does is put

by zosima 3y ago

I honestly just don't see it. I can not see anyway which anything is becoming better by this immature and ridiculous regulation. What it certainly does is put burdens on small companies, independent developers and open source projects. For no benefit whatsoever. And this is just the start.

troupo 3y ago
> I can not see anyway which anything is becoming better by this immature and ridiculous regulation. Have you read the link I provided? What exactly do you see as immature or ridiculous? > What it certainly does is put burdens on small companies, independent developers and open source projects. Of course it doesn't. That's why the major AI industries are so up in arms about it: because they have to document and describe their foundational models, and make sure their data is sound: something that they definitely don't want to do. Independent devs and open source will be fine: they already (mostly) do that. It's GDPR all over again: the industry fights it tooth and nail because they couldn't be arsed to play nice. This time the FUD has been launched preemptively in hopes to stifle this.
- zosima 3y ago
  > Of course it doesn't. That's why the major AI industries are so up in arms about it: because they have to document and describe their foundational models, and make sure their data is sound: something that they definitely don't want to do. This is now true for any 1 or 2 person startup. Making it completely impossible to succeed without huge amounts of capital. Congratulations on completely stifling innovation and making life a lot worse for everyone. > Independent devs and open source will be fine: they already (mostly) do that. They are now running the legal risk of the EU commission or some national bureaucrat thinking their models training data are not representative enough or documentation insufficient. How can these things even begin to become judicial questions?

by zosima 3y ago

troupo 3y ago

> I can not see anyway which anything is becoming better by this immature and ridiculous regulation. Have you read the link I provided? What exactly do you see as immature or ridiculous? > What it certainly does is put burdens on small companies, independent developers and open source projects. Of course it doesn't. That's why the major AI industries are so up in arms about it: because they have to document and describe their foundational models, and make sure their data is sound: something that they definitely don't want to do. Independent devs and open source will be fine: they already (mostly) do that. It's GDPR all over again: the industry fights it tooth and nail because they couldn't be arsed to play nice. This time the FUD has been launched preemptively in hopes to stifle this.

zosima 3y ago
> Of course it doesn't. That's why the major AI industries are so up in arms about it: because they have to document and describe their foundational models, and make sure their data is sound: something that they definitely don't want to do. This is now true for any 1 or 2 person startup. Making it completely impossible to succeed without huge amounts of capital. Congratulations on completely stifling innovation and making life a lot worse for everyone. > Independent devs and open source will be fine: they already (mostly) do that. They are now running the legal risk of the EU commission or some national bureaucrat thinking their models training data are not representative enough or documentation insufficient. How can these things even begin to become judicial questions?