>Wikipedia doesn't accept primary sources wikipedia accepts published papers from journals as references, despite that those are primary sources. (I thought th

>Wikipedia doesn't accept primary sources wikipedia accepts published papers from journals as references, despite that those are primary sources. (I thought they originally didn't, but they do now) How would this guy's theorems be on wikipedia if he hadn't published them? Wikipedia is leery of people editing "their own page" in the sense of conflict of interest, but cleary if you are correcting a published theorem, that is entirely within bounds. You could say on the Talk page "I published this theorem, wikipedia has it wrong."