This article has a good point. While it is obvious that the man had a clear goal of tricking people into not voting, the judge should have considered that what

This article has a good point. While it is obvious that the man had a clear goal of tricking people into not voting, the judge should have considered that what he was doing could have been funny to people online and acquitted him. It is in the very DNA of our society that no law can be made that interferes with anything that a citizen might plain get a kick out of doing. It is a dark day when we only look at people’s goals, actions and outcomes and ignore the epic lulz that were had.