4 ms·

That title reads as very passive aggressive. I assume that was intentional.

• epolanski 3y ago
  The whole post is borderline aggressive and nothing short of PR. If you want to communicate with okta you send them an email, you don't shame them publicly.
  • HL33tibCe7 3y ago
    Shaming them publicly might be the best way to get them to actually get off their arses and do something.
  • Kinrany 3y ago
    I mean, aggressiveness is a form of communication. "Get your shit together, or else."
  • FridgeSeal 3y ago
    Given that Okta’s response in the past to being hacked amounted to a weeks-worth of “nuh uhhh we didn’t, you’re lying” before then quibbling about whether it was really an issue, I think a public shaming is definitely in order.
  • NicoJuicy 3y ago
    That's BS. - 2nd time Okta was breached - Cloudflare shared/detected? it earlier. How long till more Okta customers were breached because they were silent? - Cloudflare considers authentication as very dangerous. There was a post recently: "hackers login" ( can't find the post anymore?) which means they are very consistent about these types of attacks.
• darkarmani 3y ago
  "yet another Okta compromise" sounds passive to you?