The whole point of generalized intelligence is that it's broadly applicable. That is my argument position and it is in direct contrast to what the parent is arg

The whole point of generalized intelligence is that it's broadly applicable. That is my argument position and it is in direct contrast to what the parent is arguing that only specialized intelligence counts. In attempting to counter my argument, you are changing it in your restatement. An executive of a basket weaving company is fundamentally different than Jeff the reclusive basketweaver who can only weave baskets.