Speaking of "secrets": We didn't create an open-source project for the atomic bomb. Quite the contrary: it was one of the best-kept secrets for years. Sooooo.

Speaking of "secrets": We didn't create an open-source project for the atomic bomb. Quite the contrary: it was one of the best-kept secrets for years. Sooooo... if LLMs are as revolutionary as some claim, shouldn't there be significant effort to keep new advances and developments secret and lead competitors astray? That is, if I knew something that would provide a 10- or 100-fold improvement in LLMs, my tendency would be to profit/benefit from that rather than publish it. And to mislead competitors? Has LLM technology development gone "underground" yet? And what is the role of the 3-letter agencies and the government in this radical development? Or is LLM technology all unicorns with rainbow farts where the entire world benefits and the creators get only thanks? Somehow I don't believe so.