> Colbert had to back pedal to toe the party line. Stewart referred to the party line as logic in that clip. The part where they should research it. So, not su

> Colbert had to back pedal to toe the party line. Stewart referred to the party line as logic in that clip. The part where they should research it. So, not sure if you oppose investigating it (the "party line" as you call it), or if you think it's already been proven and doesn't need any more investigation, despite not a single US intelligence agency agreeing with that sentiment.