3 ms·

What is worse is the people who went thru the trouble to make those edits in the first place will conclude that it is not worth the trouble to fix this. Then g

What is worse is the people who went thru the trouble to make those edits in the first place will conclude that it is not worth the trouble to fix this. Then go on to not make other edits because 'of that last time'. That sort of fight you basically have to stay at until someone gives up. As neither side is going to budge. Then you can do like what happened here. Let the other side think they won. Wait a year and put what you want and it would probably stand as they moved on ages ago.

permo-w 3y ago
there's a certain free-to-play multiplayer game I used to play that is absolutely full of cheaters. on one server some people built a base opposite me, and for a while I sat in my sniper's nest and took pot-shots at them. then suddenly they absolutely got my number (turned on their cheats) and I couldn't walk inside my base without getting headshot through walls. I tried my best to kill them but I realised that they were staying online just for the sake of killing me. so I logged off, came back on after an hour and blew their base to fucking kingdom come. wikipedia seems to be the same. people feed off the conflict, and if you just let the conflict die, eventually you can come and take the spoils unopposed