And even then, 130nm is basically the cutting edge from the early 2000s. Cutting edge fabs now are around 3nm. Now, "this node is X nm" has become a marketing t

And even then, 130nm is basically the cutting edge from the early 2000s. Cutting edge fabs now are around 3nm. Now, "this node is X nm" has become a marketing term with little correlation to actual transistor size, but from what I've seen, my understanding is you can expect two order of magnitude of difference in density, clock frequency, etc between a 130nm node and a 3 nm one. I suspect you'd get better performance from a cutting-edge FPGA than from one of these open processes. I'm no happy to say that. I want them to win! But it looks like they have a lot of catching up to do.