4 ms·
I found mocking blue-haired non-binary gender-fluid moralists way funnier. It would draw a really big audience, but you may not mock them - it's hate speech. e
by AnonCoward42 3y ago
I found mocking blue-haired non-binary gender-fluid moralists way funnier. It would draw a really big audience, but you may not mock them - it's hate speech.
edit: speech not crime
- daveguy 3y agoMaybe you're just not as funny as you think you are.
- AnonCoward42 3y agoMaybe NPC show is also not as funny, but the alternatives are being cancelled by butt-hurt moralists. This is sure true in Germany where "censored" would be the better word for it. I only know the big ones in the US and they were funny at some point, but the ones I saw all suffer from TDS by now. It's weird how people get so enraged by one person to the point they get silly and the silliness doesn't stop when the (media) presence goes away. It looks like a big hug box with a lot of copium junkies. That's not funny and I don't need to be funny, but I feel like the people in this hug box should be made fun of.
- daveguy 3y agoWow. TDS? You are a sad little person with sad little hangups about your dear leader.
- AnonCoward42 3y agoI am German. If I'd make jokes about my dear leader I could face prison ;)
- daveguy 3y agoYour dear leader is the one you suppress speech about by labeling dissent as derangement.
- AnonCoward42 3y agoDo you feel suppressed by me? You should also consult Wikipedia about "the leader" of the Germans. I didn't label dissent as derangement and I even outlined (my) definition of TDS. You could easily apply it to other people than orange-utan and it isn't strictly limited to political affiliation either. However, nobody today embodies the baseless outrage triggering like the guy with the tiny hands. And let's face it, baseless outrage is also more often seen in one political movement today. Some even say they are suppressed by challenging opinions ;)
- daveguy 3y agoAwww. Aren't you delusionally pathetic. I said you were trying to suppress dissent about your dear leader with your pathetic propaganda tactics. I didn't say you were successful. Your dear leader is a tool and you're a fool for parroting his propaganda. Run along now.
- AnonCoward42 3y agoI don't like Olaf Scholz either; what's your point? > I said you were trying to suppress dissent ... No, you did not.
- daveguy 3y ago> No, you did not. I get that reading comprehension isn't your thing. And living in denial is your thing. But that's just pathetic. Try again.
- AnonCoward42 3y ago> Your dear leader is the one you suppress speech about by labeling dissent as derangement. Where in that sentence is the "trying"? It's not even implied; it's just not there. TDS really disables any rational thought.
- 3y ago
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]