2 ms·

The headline is misleading. The suit is not about the footage of the arrest, but separate accompanying statements.

• FireBeyond 3y ago
  It's not misleading. It's the "footage of the arrest, with narration" (not "separate statements") that went viral.
  • rahimnathwani 3y ago
    The headline suggests that the footage of the arrest is what the cops are claiming is an invasion of privacy. But the claim is about the accompanying comments/captions, some of which talk about things that don't happen in the video and didn't happen during the interaction.
    • FireBeyond 3y ago
      In this case, the two are intrinsically connected. I get what you're saying. I also think "Cops are suing a teen for invasion of privacy based on his narration of a viral video of their body cam footage of his arrest" is a little unwieldy.