4 ms·
Call me a skeptic in Qualcomm...the keyword here is "will try". Based on their track record, likely will take a couple of generational iterations before having
by paulpan 3y ago
Call me a skeptic in Qualcomm...the keyword here is "will try". Based on their track record, likely will take a couple of generational iterations before having something competitive.
A near-perfect example is Qualcomm's switch of its Snapdragon SOCs to 64-bit to catch up to Apple with its SD 808 and 810 lineup. But those were notorious for overheating and it wasn't until the later SD 820 and 835 - but by then Apple's A-series performance lead was significantly greater.
Also others noted, hardware performance is only 1/2 of the equation - the software OS, drivers, and apps all also need to be optimized. Microsoft seems to be perennially struggling in its Windows-to-ARM transition so certainly doesn't help matters.
The dark horse is the ongoing ARM-Qualcomm lawsuit to unwind its Nuvia acquisition and prevent the IP from being used in future products. If that comes to fruition, then guaranteed there'll be huge delays.
- goosedragons 3y agoHonestly Windows on ARM isn't horrid. The OS is fine, and with an ARM web browser it can be hard to tell it's not x86. They do need to push devs a little harder to get ARM versions out there. It's kinda silly that there seems to be more ARM native apps available through WSL2 than Windows itself. They really need to have a team that at least goes around doing things like adding WoA support to GCC to make it easier to build open source apps for Windows on ARM.
- pjmlp 3y agoThey are trying, however without money in sight the Windows developer community won't care. https://blogs.windows.com/windowsdeveloper/2023/10/16/windows-launching-arm-advisory-service-for-developers/ https://blogs.windows.com/windowsdeveloper/2023/10/16/window...