SIDE looks impressive I wonder how it works and finds these resources. I think the evaluation is flawed these subjective numbers would mean nothing if I did th

SIDE looks impressive I wonder how it works and finds these resources. I think the evaluation is flawed these subjective numbers would mean nothing if I did the survey. Looking at some Wikipedia pages in the SIDE demo (linked in comments here), it is clear that they in some cases fail to identify what claims are made in the article, and that the subjective choice of references are too binary. I double check references on wikipedia in subjects where I have basic understanding, it is usually easy to find better references but it takes so much time. So very impressive.