7 ms·
I wonder what the viewership numbers were? The Daily Show had a constant buzz, and popped up in my newsfeed every once in a while. I've never once had his App
by senthil_rajasek 3y ago
I wonder what the viewership numbers were?
The Daily Show had a constant buzz, and popped up in my newsfeed every once in a while.
I've never once had his Apple show pop up in my feed!
I haven't seen the show but I wonder if it had the same quality as The Daily Show.
- toddmorey 3y agoIt was a different animal altogether. But some of the finest interviewing Jon’s done.
- voisin 3y agoClips were all over TikTok
- willis936 3y agoThe daily show was daily. There have been 10 episodes a year of the problem. If you saw 1/10 as much of the problem as the daily then it's outperforming in terms of buzz vs. air time.
- elif 3y agoI think the daily show format succeeded because of the ironic humor excusing some of the exaggeration and bias. I was a huge fan and even drove to DC for the rally to restore sanity during his heights. Without the ironic humor, (and without editorial oversight) jon comes across as arrogant and self righteous rants which don't use hyperbole as a punch line but as if a legitimate replacement for informed journalism. The script reads as an unhinged op-ed with rare and cherry-picked factual justifications. Even when I agree with 90% of what he's saying, I cringe at how over the top he takes it and at how his emotional investment and self-righteous attitude undercuts any thoughtful or reasoned articulation of the facts of the issue he is discussing. I'm not shocked at all that apple cut this show, and I don't even see it as censorship.
- Tactician_mark 3y agoAgreed. I'd add that it feels there's less of an establishment to rail against than in the Bush days. I'd bet there was a drop in numbers in 2009, when Obama started.
- lesuorac 3y agoI would be happy to be on the otherside of that bet considering his ratings only got better during Obama's terms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Show#Reception https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Show#Reception
- pxc 3y agoThis is more an artifact of liberal attention than of Democratic governance, which inevitably includes plenty of things to get mad about on the basis of the same kind of values.
- tracer4201 3y ago[dead]
- nonameiguess 3y agoI can't really blame the guy if he got increasingly jaded as he got older. He used to be an actual comedian and even an actor sometimes and was probably a lot happier. Becoming a full-time pundit has to be toxic to the soul. Poor life choice, but maybe this is an opportunity. Disconnect from the 24-hour outrage cycle and become human again. He's probably branded himself into too much of a corner to ever be a public figure except by being a talking head, but screw it, what's the point of money and success if you can't take it and go live a quiet happy life at some point?
- WorldMaker 3y agoThat sort of disconnect was exactly what he said he wanted to do when he left The Daily Show in the first place. I was almost sad for him when the Apple show was announced because it very much felt that he had failed at his retirement attempt. The fact that the show was so very "Old Man Yells at Clouds" only added to that feeling of sadness.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- ravenstine 3y agoThat's pretty much why I never followed Jon Stewart outside of The Daily Show. It's not that I think he's a bad guy, but his general demeanor both on and off script tells me he's not someone I'd want to be around IRL. I first started to realize this when he was on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire (holy crap, I'm realizing that was probably over 20 years ago) and his attitude was offputting. It seemed as if he found Regis to be annoying and believed that everyone else believes Regis is annoying too, except most people don't. And in other instances, he seems very self-righteous. The one good thing I'll say about Stewart is I think he's genuine, even if I don't like that side of him. For that reason, I respect him more than Stephen Colbert whom I think is always "on" and is more of a people pleaser, even though I think he's (somewhat) funnier than Stewart and is more likeable. EDIT: Wow, he was more insufferable on Millionaire than I remembered. I just found the episode on YouTube and he starts being a dickbag in the first few minutes. Apparently people still think he was funny here, but to me this is one of the least funny Jon Stewart moments I've ever seen. My personal taste, I guess. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD0vcmhmaCY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD0vcmhmaCY
- netsharc 3y agoWatching that video, to me it seems like in the first few minutes he was playing a low energy guy, but was just doing a bit he expects people will find funny. As this lady says, what people feel they're coming across might be quite different to how others perceive them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owORxKqX0nU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owORxKqX0nU .. in her book she uses an example of Obama feeling great after a debate with Mitt Romney, but the public's perception was he was too stand-offish...
- JeremyNT 3y ago> I think the daily show format succeeded because of the ironic humor excusing some of the exaggeration and bias. I was a huge fan and even drove to DC for the rally to restore sanity during his heights. I think they also just had an incredibly high concentration of talent for a while. Sure it was a product of its time, and Stewart himself was a big part of its success, but in the early 00's (especially before Colbert left) they had some really talented comedians on the show at the same time.
- Macha 3y agoCould the show have been as popular to the Daily Show full stop? One was broadcast on a TV channel most people already had, while this show was on a 5th place streaming platform which is widely perceived as being exclusive to specific premium hardware (incorrectly, but more people than not I've talked to believe you need the physical Apple TV device to view Apple TV).
- Tactician_mark 3y agoI didn't know Apple TV wasn't device exclusive until this comment
- nameless912 3y agoAs someone who works at a competitor of Apple TV, I truly don't understand the product. They don't go out of their way to make it clear you can watch Apple TV on most major devices,and they support fewer set top boxes/devices than their competitors. Part of the reason Netflix and Hulu have such good market penetration is because they make it clear you can use their product on your TV. Netflix (disclaimer: my employer, my views not company's, etc. etc. etc.) is particularly notorious for running on almost literally everything, including cable boxes and the like. Apple TV may or may not do this, but it is marketed as and feels like a much more exclusive service, hence the (erroneous, but totally understandable given Apple's hostility to other platforms) notion that Apple TV is only available on their devices. I dunno, maybe it's a loss leader/retention play, but it's a deeply strange product to me. Right up there with HBO Max dropping the only part of their brand that anyone recognized.
- interestica 3y ago> They don't go out of their way to make it clear you can watch Apple TV on most major devices Interestingly, the headline doesn't even refer to the service (Apple TV), but it refers to just "on Apple" -- which further reinforces that consumer thinking that it's an Apple-device-specific offering.
- savanaly 3y ago
- drcongo 3y agoI love Jon Stewart but this show was a turgid watch.