3 ms·
I want to balance the overall negative response here. I think people's criticism falls into one of the following categories: - "This is AI bullshit.": I haven'
by wolframhempel 3y ago
I want to balance the overall negative response here. I think people's criticism falls into one of the following categories:
- "This is AI bullshit.":
I haven't tested it extensively, but I think giving LLM's or similar constructs the ability to execute tasks and perform actions is the next step in AI capabilities. So this makes sense to me.
- "This is not an Operating System."
Maybe we need to rethink what an Operating System is. As long as computers were boxes under our desk, an operating system was the thing that operated these boxes. Now computers are everywhere and - when connected to each other in the cloud - form sort of higher level computers. Calling a system that operates the higher level computer an OS is legitimate in my eyes.
- "They put TM behind Kernel"
Ok, that one is weird.
- starbugs 3y ago> - "This is not an Operating System." Maybe we need to rethink what an Operating System is. As long as computers were boxes under our desk, an operating system was the thing that operated these boxes. Now computers are everywhere and - when connected to each other in the cloud - form sort of higher level computers. Calling a system that operates the higher level computer an OS is legitimate in my eyes. Or maybe find a better name since OS is already taken and defined? Same for kernel btw.
- JCharante 3y ago“ Now computers are everywhere and - when connected to each other in the cloud - form sort of higher level computers. Calling a system that operates the higher level computer an OS is legitimate in my eyes.” If that is the case then why is a new device (and hardware) justified?