3 ms·
It’s also often a euphemism for not being a member of the same race/gender/age/class group as the rest of the team
by SonOfKyuss 3y ago
It’s also often a euphemism for not being a member of the same race/gender/age/class group as the rest of the team
- giantg2 3y agoOr political/mindset group
- SonOfKyuss 3y agoIn my experience, both sides of an interview tend to avoid politics so that doesn’t often come into play directly. At least not in any of the technical interviews I’ve been a part of over multiple decades. Of course an interviewer may make assumptions about a candidate’s political positions based on the categories I mentioned in my original post (age, gender), but that type of fit would already be covered under those categories. I could also see religious beliefs fitting into that category of culture fit if the candidate’s attire includes religious symbols or articles of clothing.
- curtisblaine 3y ago> In my experience, both sides of an interview tend to avoid politics They do, but in many cases the interviewer looks at the social media profile of the candidates. It's always the most vocal on both sides that tend to fill their public profiles of loud political statements (so they're easy to spot) and many wouldn't hire an outspoken far right winger or a blatantly death-to-capitalism lib type in their team.
- gardenhedge 3y agoIs it though? Why is it an accepted term for such a long time then? Culture here refers to the company's culture - not the candidates.
- SonOfKyuss 3y agoIt can be both.