3 ms·
You're a virologist then? That would make sense given your other replies. > Part of me wishes the international virology community was as coordinated as you im
by nvm0n2 3y ago
You're a virologist then? That would make sense given your other replies.
> Part of me wishes the international virology community was as coordinated as you imagine
It's pretty damn coordinated and we have the receipts to prove it. Sorry for you if you're not in the loop, but when you read chat transcripts, meeting notes, and emails where they literally organize a conspiracy to shut down all public discussion, and no virologists stand up to say, "this stance is not accurate", then we may as well consider virology to be globally coordinated.
By the way, cut the condescending tone about conspiracy theorists. They utterly won this round, beyond all possible doubt. The people who blithely dismiss any possibility of academic conspiracy turned out to be the naive ones. The people who posited a conspiracy to suppress discussion of lab leaks can now point to reams of hard evidence where scientists literally say they're going to publish statements they don't believe for political reasons, where they say they're going to engineer a SARS-CoV-2 like virus, where they say they're going to do it in order to develop a vaccine against it. Basically every conspiracy theory turned out to be true. You should respect that a lot more!
- shadowgovt 3y agoMost of what you're just wrote is flatly untrue. If there are receipts, post them.