3 ms·

I find it a little difficult to discuss with you? That's not what I was saying. The argument says that there will always be some pre-existence, which you could

I find it a little difficult to discuss with you? That's not what I was saying. The argument says that there will always be some pre-existence, which you could call 'God' if you liked. Or you could call it 'the universe just existing', as I do. The argument doesn't say that a specific God exists. It says that there will always be some pre-existence, and in saying that the argument is valid. That is the point.

thomastjeffery 3y ago
> The argument says that there will always be some pre-existence, which you could call 'God' if you liked. The story did. I explained why I would not (God is superfluous). Beyond that, any notion of "pre-existence" is as circular as a notion of "beginning". To present God as a part of this story only serves to present the unkown as "settled", which I find absurd.