Sure, and there goes any credibility they had. Could have just stated the facts, not even written any of the "Why is the ozone hole so big?" section. Had they

Sure, and there goes any credibility they had. Could have just stated the facts, not even written any of the "Why is the ozone hole so big?" section. Had they presented facts from their space-borne instruments, analyzed said data honestly, no leading thoughts - would have been plenty; they'd have an interesting article and more importantly not lied (or seen to) to our faces.