3 ms·
The only reason I can think of is to avoid diplomatic problems. When scientific reporting doesn’t make sense it is either due to ignorance or politics, and I do
by brutusborn 3y ago
The only reason I can think of is to avoid diplomatic problems. When scientific reporting doesn’t make sense it is either due to ignorance or politics, and I doubt the ESA has an issue with ignorance.
- 6th 3y agoSure, and there goes any credibility they had. Could have just stated the facts, not even written any of the "Why is the ozone hole so big?" section. Had they presented facts from their space-borne instruments, analyzed said data honestly, no leading thoughts - would have been plenty; they'd have an interesting article and more importantly not lied (or seen to) to our faces.