4 ms·

dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37931424 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37931424

• bookofjoe 3y ago
  Actually not a dupe: the link above is a press release, whereas the more recent link: https://academic.oup.com/brain/advance-article/doi/10.1093/brain/awad303/7308687 https://academic.oup.com/brain/advance-article/doi/10.1093/b... is a corrected proof of the actual scientific paper summarized in the press release.
  • pvg 3y ago
    Those are dupes by HN dupetheory.
    • bookofjoe 3y ago
      Just added HN dupetheory to my lexicon. Love it.
      • dang 3y ago
        Yes, the criterion we apply is "is this substantially the same story", and/or (more or less the same thing) "can this lead to a substantially different discussion" than the previous thread. This one is substantially the same story, hence it's treated as a dupe, even though of course it's not the same article.
        • bookofjoe 3y ago
          Press release = Corrected paper proof? Ok.....
          • dang 3y ago
            That's not the equation. It's something more like: "HN discussion of corrected paper proof is unlikely to be sufficiently different from HN discussion of earlier release on same work".
            • bookofjoe 3y ago
              Fair enough
• dang 3y ago
  Comments moved thither. Thanks!