12 ms·

I asked ChatGPT what the Great March of Return was: > The Great March of Return was a series of Palestinian protests organized by various groups, including Ham

I asked ChatGPT what the Great March of Return was: > The Great March of Return was a series of Palestinian protests organized by various groups, including Hamas, to demand the right of Palestinian refugees and their descendants to return to their ancestral homes in what is now Israel. The protests took place along the border between the Gaza Strip and Israel and were intended to draw attention to the Palestinian refugee issue and the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. > These protests often resulted in clashes with Israeli security forces, leading to casualties and fatalities on both sides. The situation was complex and highly charged, with different narratives and interpretations of events.

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
zogrodea 3y ago
How did it know the answer when the cutoff date is meant to January 2022? (I just found another instance at [0] so maybe "cutoff" doesn't mean exactly what it seems.) https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11iv2uc/theres_no_actual_cut_off_date_for_chatgpt_if_you/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11iv2uc/theres_no_...
- greenie_beans 3y ago
  the great march of return was in 2018 - 2019. the idf committed some brutal war crimes against the protestors. watch this video if you'd like to learn more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnZSaKYmP2s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnZSaKYmP2s i shared the answer to expose the bias of chatgpt. it interjected "including hamas" into the answer and said there were "fatalities on both sides".
  - zogrodea 3y ago
    Thanks for the answer! Appreciate it. I didn't catch the use of "including Hamas" until you mentioned it either.
  - pc86 3y ago
    > it interjected "including hamas" into the answer and said there were "fatalities on both sides". Are either of these statements false?
    - deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    - klyrs 3y ago
      Wikipedia cites the Jerusalem Post saying that there was one fatality, and the Human Rights Council saying there were zero, on the Israel side. The same HRC report[1] reports 183 fatalities. This is a case where there is a broad gulf between "truth" and "not false." And I'm inclined to think that "fatalities," plural, was a one-sided affair. [1] https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/CoIOPT/A_HRC_40_74.pdf https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies...
  - throwing_away 3y ago
    I really know nothing about this conflict, but when I check the source for that youtube video I find it is put together by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_Martin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_Martin If you're looking for objective facts, this might not be it.
    - enterprise_cog 3y ago
      Why do you say that?
      - throwing_away 3y ago
        She started as a "inside job" 9/11 truther, then worked at RT for a few years, and is now actively covering Palestine from an explicitly pro-Palestinian point of view. She also works on the "Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions" anti-Israel movement. Maybe she has valuable footage or a valuable viewpoint or just an opinion you're curious about, and that's fine. Just know what you're getting.

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

zogrodea 3y ago

How did it know the answer when the cutoff date is meant to January 2022? (I just found another instance at [0] so maybe "cutoff" doesn't mean exactly what it seems.) https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11iv2uc/theres_no_actual_cut_off_date_for_chatgpt_if_you/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11iv2uc/theres_no_...

greenie_beans 3y ago
the great march of return was in 2018 - 2019. the idf committed some brutal war crimes against the protestors. watch this video if you'd like to learn more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnZSaKYmP2s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnZSaKYmP2s i shared the answer to expose the bias of chatgpt. it interjected "including hamas" into the answer and said there were "fatalities on both sides".
- zogrodea 3y ago
  Thanks for the answer! Appreciate it. I didn't catch the use of "including Hamas" until you mentioned it either.
- pc86 3y ago
  > it interjected "including hamas" into the answer and said there were "fatalities on both sides". Are either of these statements false?
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - klyrs 3y ago
    Wikipedia cites the Jerusalem Post saying that there was one fatality, and the Human Rights Council saying there were zero, on the Israel side. The same HRC report[1] reports 183 fatalities. This is a case where there is a broad gulf between "truth" and "not false." And I'm inclined to think that "fatalities," plural, was a one-sided affair. [1] https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/CoIOPT/A_HRC_40_74.pdf https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies...
- throwing_away 3y ago
  I really know nothing about this conflict, but when I check the source for that youtube video I find it is put together by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_Martin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abby_Martin If you're looking for objective facts, this might not be it.
  - enterprise_cog 3y ago
    Why do you say that?
    - throwing_away 3y ago
      She started as a "inside job" 9/11 truther, then worked at RT for a few years, and is now actively covering Palestine from an explicitly pro-Palestinian point of view. She also works on the "Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions" anti-Israel movement. Maybe she has valuable footage or a valuable viewpoint or just an opinion you're curious about, and that's fine. Just know what you're getting.