3 ms·
I agree that the average person doesn't generally know how technology works. I think the solution is not to limit the use of technology but to restrict the expo
by f233f2 3y ago
I agree that the average person doesn't generally know how technology works. I think the solution is not to limit the use of technology but to restrict the exposure of the average person to technology until they can prove that they know how it works (some sort of internet license, if you will)
- pjerem 3y agotbf, with AI, even technologists doesn’t generally know how it works.
- TrapLord_Rhodo 3y agoWell because we've found our way into a shadow area of non-deterministic computing. With human language, aggregate data and techniques like "Two shot prompting" or vectorization nodes effecting performance on some models we will continue to go into a "gray area" of computing. the question soon becomes "How can I tweak this non-deterministic AGI to tell me the secrets of the universe?"
- vivekd 3y agoMaybe the solution here is just what the parent suggested a disclaimer - a small message saying this was translated by an Ai, may not be 100% accurate - just so people are aware. Not for liability but just to make people aware
- gwright 3y agoMaybe we need to develop some iconography to annotate text and images that were produced/generated with AI/ML? Like we have U+2622 to indicate a radiation warning. Similarly, U+2620 for poison, U+2623 for biological hazard, U+26A1 for electrical hazard or the generic U+26A0 for hazards. (edited to replace characters with U+ notation)