3 ms·
>"high calorie" lards and beef fats on things like the fries, whereas today things use more "low calorie" vegetable oils. This is nonsense. All fat is high cal
by InSteady 3y ago
>"high calorie" lards and beef fats on things like the fries, whereas today things use more "low calorie" vegetable oils.
This is nonsense. All fat is high calorie at roughly the same rate, 9 calories per gram (unless there are other additives, like we find in butter and margarine). There might be a few percentage points difference in calorie per unit mass from fat to fat but this is negligible when you're talking about a class of foods that all contain around 100 calories per tablespoon.
If you read the paper the linked article is based on, found here [0], fructose indeed appears to be the smoking gun that connects several different partially correct, but fragmented explanations for the prevalence of obesity in modern society.
[0] - https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2022.0230 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2022.023...
Edit - you also state below that hydrogenated soybean oil (margarine) has fewer calories than butter. A quick web search disagrees, putting hydrogenated soybean oil at 884 calories per 100 grams, margarine at 719 calories per 100 grams, and butter at 717 calories per 100 grams. I'm sure it all depends on the brand and processing techniques, but overall the concept of low calorie fat is hugely misleading. Otherwise we can compare butter to ghee and determine that butter is a low calorie fat, which is more nonsense.
- WorldMaker 3y agoI find it hard to call that paper a smoking gun. It makes a great case and offers testable hypotheses but does not indicate that those hypotheses have been tested yet. It was also just one of 16 very different theories submitted to the same meeting: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/toc/rstb/2023/378/1885 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/toc/rstb/2023/378/1885 What I skimmed of the other 15 all had similarly great cases, despite very different thinking, and similarly untested hypotheses. I don't think there is a single easy answer here. Certainly there are a lot of offered "easy" answers, among the 16 above, and all the more you see in threads around here. Again, this seems too complex a puzzle in general and the more pieces we find the more questions we have and hypotheses to test. (Whether or not you agree with my skepticism of calories and belief that they are an outdated and uselessly unscientific metric.)