5 ms·
this could easily have happened with non-AI translations
by permo-w 3y ago
this could easily have happened with non-AI translations
- nerdponx 3y agoNotice that GP said "machine translation", not "AI". Let's think of it instead as a "nonlinear high-dimensional sequence translation model trained on some large and unknown corpus". Does that make it less problematic?
- mcguire 3y agoHow is that not AI?
- HeWhoLurksLate 3y agobecause it isn't smart?
- bobthepanda 3y agoStupidity and ignorance aren’t enough to excuse liability.
- kibibu 3y agoStatistical machine translation is one of those areas that was considered AI until it worked, then it just became tech. See also: speech recognition, grammar checking, OCR, theorem proving
- nerdponx 3y agoThat was kind of my point. I don't think we should be quick to distinguish between "AI" and other algorithms/techniques, because what makes something "AI" is more a matter of opinion and perspective than anything else.
- rat9988 3y agoThen you just missed that non-AI means human depending on context.
- nerdponx 3y agoI don't believe that this could have easily happened with human translation except as an instance of deliberate malice or improbably enormous ineptitude, so I assigned a very low prior probability to that interpretation.
- giraffe_lady 3y agoNo? Why would it?
- elil17 3y agoIf a human translator translated "Praise god" as "Palestinian terrorists are fighting for their freedom" I'm pretty sure they'd be fired immediately. In contrast, Instagram is not going to be taking down their machine translation tool.
- permo-w 3y agonot AI /= human
- coding123 3y ago/= != !=
- i_have_an_idea 3y agoAI /= LLM
- mcpackieh 3y agoWhat did the translation, a dog?
- idonotknowwhy 3y agoGoogle translate or other non-Ai software
- pclmulqdq 3y ago
- giraffe_lady 3y agoLots of things could have happened we're talking about this specific thing that did though.
- ilyt 3y agoWell, if you picked cheapest bidder that copy-pasted it into google translate, maybe. Actual translator doing a job would look at the context and probably figure out that something's not right, but AI have no such double takes, if it for example because of learning material it will link euphemism to actual meaning of the word