4 ms·

MidJourney seems to have a much wider range of style more easily accessible. I'm having trouble getting DALL-E 3 to produce less "plastic-y" figures.

diggan 3y ago
What prompts are you using? Unsure about what exactly you mean, but seems it's capable of generating different styles pretty easily. Here is three (x4) examples: https://imgur.com/a/X0IbtIX https://imgur.com/a/X0IbtIX > Create four images made with as different styles as possible (eg plastic, metallic, organic and something else). Make the images about a PC desktop computer standing on a desk, and a screen that shows Hacker News frontpage > Create four new images with more different styles > Create four similar images with the style "out of this world"
- reaperman 3y ago
  “Photorealistic cat” or “photo of a cat” They all look like characters from the WALL-E movie. None of them would be mistaken for an actual photo of a cat.
  - diggan 3y ago
    I'm guessing that it's giving you that kind of image because usually photograph captions don't use keywords like "photorealistic", it's mostly when you're doing illustrations, concept art and similar, that you use it to convey it's trying to imitate a photo. So it's creating images that look like those images, rather than actual photos. Here is "Create four photographs of a cat": https://imgur.com/a/dRlCwqy https://imgur.com/a/dRlCwqy Iteration "Make the photos more realistic so they look like pictures taken with a real DLSR camera": https://imgur.com/a/WX0LEjD https://imgur.com/a/WX0LEjD Seems to produce OK results.
  - robbrown451 3y ago
    This one, to me, could be mistaken for not only an actual photo of a dog, but my own dog. (aside from the cyborg implant, which is a bit of a giveaway :) ) https://www.karmatics.com/stuff/cyborgdog.jpg https://www.karmatics.com/stuff/cyborgdog.jpg I didn't even bother saying "photorealistic", but I did give lighting hints: "tricolor english shepherd future cyborg parts on head and front leg, very futuristic tech, replaces side of head and eye, black anodized aluminum, orange leds, big raised camera eye where normal eye would be, with colorful rich deep teal artificial iris, in worn future urban park with pond and stone bridge but pretty near dark with streetlight above beautiful dog and technology"
robbrown451 3y ago
I don't tend to get plastic-y images. I think DALL-Es images are less plastic looking than either typical CG movies (even Pixar) or Midjourney. Do you consider these plastic looking? https://www.karmatics.com/stuff/dalle.html https://www.karmatics.com/stuff/dalle.html One important thing is to give long prompts with lots of adjectives.

diggan 3y ago

What prompts are you using? Unsure about what exactly you mean, but seems it's capable of generating different styles pretty easily. Here is three (x4) examples: https://imgur.com/a/X0IbtIX https://imgur.com/a/X0IbtIX > Create four images made with as different styles as possible (eg plastic, metallic, organic and something else). Make the images about a PC desktop computer standing on a desk, and a screen that shows Hacker News frontpage > Create four new images with more different styles > Create four similar images with the style "out of this world"

reaperman 3y ago
“Photorealistic cat” or “photo of a cat” They all look like characters from the WALL-E movie. None of them would be mistaken for an actual photo of a cat.
- diggan 3y ago
  I'm guessing that it's giving you that kind of image because usually photograph captions don't use keywords like "photorealistic", it's mostly when you're doing illustrations, concept art and similar, that you use it to convey it's trying to imitate a photo. So it's creating images that look like those images, rather than actual photos. Here is "Create four photographs of a cat": https://imgur.com/a/dRlCwqy https://imgur.com/a/dRlCwqy Iteration "Make the photos more realistic so they look like pictures taken with a real DLSR camera": https://imgur.com/a/WX0LEjD https://imgur.com/a/WX0LEjD Seems to produce OK results.
- robbrown451 3y ago
  This one, to me, could be mistaken for not only an actual photo of a dog, but my own dog. (aside from the cyborg implant, which is a bit of a giveaway :) ) https://www.karmatics.com/stuff/cyborgdog.jpg https://www.karmatics.com/stuff/cyborgdog.jpg I didn't even bother saying "photorealistic", but I did give lighting hints: "tricolor english shepherd future cyborg parts on head and front leg, very futuristic tech, replaces side of head and eye, black anodized aluminum, orange leds, big raised camera eye where normal eye would be, with colorful rich deep teal artificial iris, in worn future urban park with pond and stone bridge but pretty near dark with streetlight above beautiful dog and technology"

robbrown451 3y ago

I don't tend to get plastic-y images. I think DALL-Es images are less plastic looking than either typical CG movies (even Pixar) or Midjourney. Do you consider these plastic looking? https://www.karmatics.com/stuff/dalle.html https://www.karmatics.com/stuff/dalle.html One important thing is to give long prompts with lots of adjectives.