2 ms·
The genie is out of the bottle, though. Frankly, nobody is able to do everything about it, at and individual or even state level. If as a government you decide
by benterix 3y ago
The genie is out of the bottle, though. Frankly, nobody is able to do everything about it, at and individual or even state level. If as a government you decide to limit AI (in terms of research, applications, grants etc.), you will put your country at a disadvantage because there will always be others who will not have such objections. The same is true at all lower levels.
- jprete 3y agoOnly a handful of polities, in practice, would need to agree on a strong response - the US, China, the EU, and maybe India and Russia.
- benterix 3y agoThat's my point. You can expect China react like this: https://www.science.org/content/article/its-crispr-revolution-china-becomes-world-leader-genome-editing https://www.science.org/content/article/its-crispr-revolutio...
- barrysteve 3y agoPeople have this one track (or binary) mind about AI. There are more options. We should cut out the middle man and start building a map of all likely programming symbols a stream of integers/bytes can create. LLMs can hide data and source code behind weighted nodes. The easiest way to cut through that is map out the binary stream directly. Sounds insanely complex, but it isn't really. It's safe to say the cast majority of code is boiler plate running in popular coding languages, with similar symbolic 'shapes'. We should probably cut the head from the current abstraction stack (isa>assembly>C>C++) and start-over, interpreting blobs of binary straight up.