3 ms·
>It doesn't have to be that way, and plenty of places do it better - and have healitier, more equal societies as a result. Where?
by boppo1 3y ago
>It doesn't have to be that way, and plenty of places do it better - and have healitier, more equal societies as a result.
Where?
- okokwhatever 3y agoBang! You got the point mate.
- tomjen3 3y agoDenmark, for one. Here we have an extension on the election system in Britain where your local area still does first past the post, but any "wasted votes" are then used to get candidates from a broader geographical area, so that each party ends up with nearly the same number of votes per member they send to parliament. This means that there are 12 parties in our parliament (not counting those from Greenland and the Faroe Islands), but only 3 in the UK parliament. I can't say we are healtier, but we are more equal with our votes than the UK are - if the UK had the same system the conservatives wouldn't have had the numbers to dictate Brexit.