5 ms·
Airdrop is very nice when it works. Modern apple hardware has a second wifi modem for an ad-hoc connection so it can be faster than normal wifi as well. But Ap
by klabb3 3y ago
Airdrop is very nice when it works. Modern apple hardware has a second wifi modem for an ad-hoc connection so it can be faster than normal wifi as well.
But Apple only.. makes it much less useful, even for “Apple people”.
- saagarjha 3y agoYou sure about this? I seem to recall it shared the usual Wi-Fi hardware.
- creshal 3y agoTechnically yes, it's a virtual device, but not all wifi hardware is capable of running two networks at the same time, Apple carefully selected the "usual" hardware to support this.
- marwis 3y agoI think this is required for WiFi Direct and supported by all hardware?
- lxgr 3y agoAlmost all Wi-Fi chipsets released in the last couple of years support this. Many Windows and Android devices have been able to share a Wi-Fi network with other devices over another SSID, for example. The only thing that's complicated is if a device needs to be a 802.11 station on one frequency/channel, and a host or P2P device on another, but that's almost always avoidable. Everything else can be done purely in firmware or software.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- lxgr 3y ago> Modern apple hardware has a second wifi modem Do you have any sources for that? As far as I know, it's just time-sharing the same baseband and hardware used for regular infrastructure-mode Wi-Fi.
- snickerbockers 3y agoHas it ever been reverse engineered and reimplemented? I use apple's IP audio streaming protocol (forget what it's called, air-something) to play music over a couple of edifier-brand speakers from a Linux desktop which is running pipewire's FOSS implementation of the protocol. I don't even buy apple products but i ended up using it because there's no way to just netcat samples onto these things.
- stonegray 3y agoThere is an open implementation of AWDL, see https://owlink.org/wiki/ https://owlink.org/wiki/