3 ms·
In opposition to what the author thinks, I do think that the appeal was viewed by a human (probably from an outsourced agency somewhere far away) who simply did
by kioleanu 3y ago
In opposition to what the author thinks, I do think that the appeal was viewed by a human (probably from an outsourced agency somewhere far away) who simply didn't have 1) the capacity to understand what the author is selling 2) time enough to read the appeal, research and understand the problem and 3) possibly sufficient control over the English language
- mcintyre1994 3y agoAnd also apparently nothing to base their decision on since all the data is apparently deleted since it’s over 180 days old.
- gmerc 3y agoEven if someone saw it they have 20 sec to review a case and only get very limited context. It’s a farce
- cozzyd 3y agoRight, how likely is it that the people reviewing know anything about software.
- reuven 3y agoActually, they explicitly said (on some page, or in some e-mail) that both the original evaluation and the appeal were handled automatically. I can't find that evidence, but I remember reading it and saying, "OMG, you've got to be kidding me." Based on what they've told me, I have every reason to believe that no human ever reviewed my case.
- Terretta 3y agoIn Screenshot Meta says both were made by technology.