3 ms·
I cannot speak for the “spirit” of the GPL but I can certainly read the text. If the FSF wants to stop somebody from doing what Red Hat is doing ( which would
by LeFantome 3y ago
I cannot speak for the “spirit” of the GPL but I can certainly read the text.
If the FSF wants to stop somebody from doing what Red Hat is doing ( which would long term be bad for Free Software in my view ), they are going to have to revise the license.
I guess the GPL4 will just be the next GPL license that the Linux kernel does not adopt as the differences between Free Software and Open Source start to diverge further.
- LightFog 3y agoMy reading of it was more ‘I think they shouldn’t do that’ rather than ‘we are going to try to stop them doing that’. A morality vs legality kind of thing.
- LeFantome 3y agoI respect that. I just happen to think Red Hat is in the right morally as well. The right to commercially compete with a company by shamelessly ripping off their product and contributing nothing in return is not something I see as deeply moral. Trying to make that harder feels, to me, like a perfectly ethical thing for Red Hat to do. And as I said elsewhere, “the code” is not the value that the RHEL clones are trying to rip off and commercialize.