5 ms·
Ahh okay wasn't aware the encodings were different, after taking a glance at spec it seems much better than what I pessimistically envisioned. 2 NaNs, and -0 s
by notnullorvoid 3y ago
Ahh okay wasn't aware the encodings were different, after taking a glance at spec it seems much better than what I pessimistically envisioned.
2 NaNs, and -0 still seem like a bad call (-0 could have been the singular NaN), but I guess I understand maybe why they don't want to deviate too much from IEEE754 floats.