4 ms·
Police then get warrants for users' electronic devices But that’s not what happened. I don’t practice in Colorado, but my guess is that a judge would deny such
by tiahura 3y ago
Police then get warrants for users' electronic devices
But that’s not what happened. I don’t practice in Colorado, but my guess is that a judge would deny such a warrant without something more, e.g. the person has a prior conviction for arson, or there’s a personal connection with the victims. If you’re just the Amazon delivery guy, I don’t see it happening.
- singleshot_ 3y agoYou misunderstood how and when the warrant was issued. “The person” who you are assuming must have had some other incriminating evidence against him was not even identified until after the warrant was executed.
- heavyset_go 3y agoI don't have that confidence. Judges and grand juries grant warrants based on the beliefs, strong feelings and lies/embellishments of law enforcement too regularly. > my guess is that a judge would deny such a warrant without something more, e.g. the person has a prior conviction for arson, or there’s a personal connection with the victims. Or they're the wrong religion, race, nationality, seem "suspicious", know/related to felons, don't belong to the good ol' boys club, etc.
- oxygen_crisis 3y ago> But that’s not what happened. That definitely happened. 98. Law enforcement also served an additional warrant on Google for the account information belonging to E.M. There was no connection between Mr. Seymour, Mr. Bui, D.S., and E.M., except that E.M. searched for the address of the fire within the specified time frame. As a result, law enforcement obtained E.M.’s entire Google history, including all of her location history and search history, but did not find any connection to the fire. https://www.nacdl.org/getattachment/343f777f-46d4-4c04-b85a-26b34908f544/Seymour-rule-21-petition.pdf https://www.nacdl.org/getattachment/343f777f-46d4-4c04-b85a-...