> You're ignoring second and third order consequences, and you're insisting people simply tolerate harassment, bigotry and threats of violence against themselve

> You're ignoring second and third order consequences, and you're insisting people simply tolerate harassment, bigotry and threats of violence against themselves simply because [ad hominems] First, nobody is ignoring second and third order consequences as evidenced by the discussion of consequences in the GP comment. Second, nobody suggested "simply tolerating" because free speech absolutists see speech as a thing they can engage in, not just something that happens to them. There is room for a more rational discussion of this, but please understand that I think you have every right to your style of discourse, too.