4 ms·
I don't mean this as a particular defence of Binance chain per se - and I realise I'm not directly answering your question either - but pedestrian everyday usag
by crtified 3y ago
I don't mean this as a particular defence of Binance chain per se - and I realise I'm not directly answering your question either - but pedestrian everyday usage of no special note would, by its very nature, go entirely unremarked, certainly by any 'news' source. It's only ever the dramatic heists, the hackings, thefts, etc, that drive reported media.
Therefore, the fact that "every time [you] read about" it, it involves some dramatic exceptional circumstance, is somewhat par-for-the-course.
By the same standard, the only things that I - as a non-enthusiast - ever read about the art world, is the extreme valuations, the thefts, the rude vandalisms. The only things I ever read about banks are the record profits, the manipulations of finance, the robberies. The only thing I ever read about the Middle East, is war.
The fact that it's mostly filled with decent ordinary people just trying to live their lives, is the boring, the unremarked yet dominant landscape, which somehow gets lost in the loud buzz of persistent drama.
- theogravity 3y agoI get what you're saying. Media bias towards certain headlines. I was extremely active in the crypto scene for many years (participating in Polkadot auctions, ETH domain names, NFT card games, DAI repo auctions, de-fi apps etc) and have never seen a legitimate use-case come out of BSC at all (they were always scam coins) and was wondering if anyone else has felt the same or had any evidence proving otherwise.