3 ms·
It sucks, but running a site like YouTube is expensive. I hope the trade-off is less ads overall since everyone will be forced to watch them (at least in theor
by adocomplete 3y ago
It sucks, but running a site like YouTube is expensive.
I hope the trade-off is less ads overall since everyone will be forced to watch them (at least in theory), because using YouTube today without an ad-blocker is a terrible experience. I've been paying for Premium for years now, but every now and then I'll go to YouTube when not logged in and my god is it bad.
- tsingy 3y agoThey are profitable, this is just an attempt to get more money.
- badpun 3y agoIs youtube really profitable?
- Condition1952 3y agoif they need to save money, they can bargain the $20,000,000,000 a year deal through which they pay Apple money
- uberman 3y agoIs it 30 billion a year expensive?