4 ms·
Whoops, you're right, Is the solution to that, a) [1] or b) [1, <new element>] ? >Notably, the server has to sequence actions somehow [...] Yes, that's m
by moralestapia 3y ago
Whoops, you're right,
Is the solution to that,
a) [1]
or
b) [1, <new element>]
?
>Notably, the server has to sequence actions somehow [...]
Yes, that's my whole point, you have to fallback to something like LLW, and then it's over for the transactional model :P.
Edit: Btw, I'm not trying to be the snarky, pessimistic dude. This kind of models are really interesting and I love working with them. I am just trying to illustrate how things could go awry without much complexity involved.
- chrisco255 3y agoNo, the server is going to process the actions in a single queue. So again, it's whatever action arrives first.
- moralestapia 3y agoThen it's LLW and you're no longer playing this game.
- chrisco255 3y agoI don't know what LLW means, but you seem fixated on the acronym. It's just first come, first serve transaction ordering from the world I come from.
- gnat 3y agoPerhaps it's a typo/braino for LWW, Last Write Wins.
- moralestapia 3y agoIt is! Thanks!