4 ms·
I'm a First Amendment absolutist who doesn't like what is going on. Winston & Strawn and Davis, Polk & Wardell had decided that the law students qualified for j
by TMWNN 3y ago
I'm a First Amendment absolutist who doesn't like what is going on. Winston & Strawn and Davis, Polk & Wardell had decided that the law students qualified for job offers. That the firms decided that the students no longer qualified because of something, not violating the law, that the students are associated with is alarming.
That also goes for calls for a "nationwide boycott", however informal, by employers of students associated with the unpopular cause of the day, or demands by large donors for the resignations of university leaders that did not insufficiently condemn pro-Hamas words by others associated with the universities.
(And yes, despite the large-scale infiltration of leftist anti-Semitism into academia and politics in recent decades that has now hugely backfired on the Jews that were among its aiders and abetters, support of Hamas is still the unpopular cause, relatively speaking. But not as unpopular as it ought to be.)
- tguvot 3y agoain't under current legal framework in usa what those companies do can be classified as free speech as well ? i remember some cases in past years that classified actions in this way
- raxxorraxor 3y agoTrue, in a way it is just making the same mistakes of silencing unpopular opinions. I hope these Harvard students stayed way under their potential with a message like this at a time when Israel was invaded. It reflects badly on the education. This was a bit beyond bad taste. Still, effort should be made to widen the discourse again, instead of reiterating bad ideas like "speech has consequences".
- matt005 3y ago[flagged]