4 ms·
It's not magic but it is a radically different pricing model: pay once, host forever. I see it as a massive bet on storage prices continuing to decrease.
by numtel 3y ago
It's not magic but it is a radically different pricing model: pay once, host forever.
I see it as a massive bet on storage prices continuing to decrease.
- yieldcrv 3y agoI think nocoiners completely miss this aspect, the media too many devs will always post their applications on blockchains, and simply do system design conducive to that environment, because web 2.0 cloud models do not compete in pricing especially if you have a burst of activity many devs bring their whole audience over, and the audience is willing to pay to update the state of the application with no overhead cost to the dev, which is also impossible to implement in web 2.0 cloud offerings, aside from just searching and hoping for free tiers who cares if none of those applications match your use case, just call it the entertainment sector then and you still have value and utility to someone, that self perpetuates
- jbaczuk 3y agoor pay never and host it on the infected website
- meltedcapacitor 3y agoIf it becomes a problem consensus can evolve to trim inactive data (say expiring unspent outputs after N blocks in UTXO chains, "move it or lose it" model) or explicit charging for storage per unit of size and time (decay some associated balance accordingly).