3 ms·
What you saying makes sense, but I am thinking that this may be false economy. It of course depends on the nature of background tasks, but likely they would hav
by varispeed 3y ago
What you saying makes sense, but I am thinking that this may be false economy. It of course depends on the nature of background tasks, but likely they would have a chance to finish quicker on a performance core than on efficiency core and if main workload depends on those e.g. something generating an event, you still are probably going to get a performance penalty greater than if everything was running on P cores or if main task needs I/O and slow background process is blocking it for longer.