6 ms·

note that each of these has their own issues. From a security/privacy pov, Mull, Mullvad Browser, and Tor Browser are generally most respected. I'm not familiar

• _lvbh 3y ago
  What are the issues for Librewolf?
  • contact9879 3y ago
    LibreWolf is one of the better Firefox forks but it doesn't have automatic updates and you're relying on a relatively small team to keep it up-to-date. At that point, Mullvad Browser would be a better choice.
    • commoner 3y ago
      > it doesn't have automatic updates That's not accurate. LibreWolf has an automatic updater for Windows.[1] On Linux, updates for most applications are handled by the operating system's package manager, and LibreWolf also maintains a Flatpak.[2] On macOS, LibreWolf has a Homebrew cask.[3] Flatpak and Homebrew can be configured for automatic updates. I've been very satisifed with LibreWolf and haven't experienced any significant issues. > Mullvad Browser would be a better choice Mullvad Browser is a nice fork, but it doesn't include any syncing (like Firefox Sync), which makes it a non-starter as a primary browser for anyone who uses that feature. [1] https://librewolf.net/installation/windows/ https://librewolf.net/installation/windows/ [2] https://flathub.org/apps/io.gitlab.librewolf-community https://flathub.org/apps/io.gitlab.librewolf-community [3] https://librewolf.net/installation/macos/ https://librewolf.net/installation/macos/
      • askiiart 3y ago
        It's worth noting that the Librewolf Windows updater isn't official, though it is packaged in the installer.