3 ms·
Not sure what you mean. Maybe it's just my biases, but I don't think most people would be against fake OnlyFans performers or AI porn with 100% fake personas. B
by sbrother 3y ago
Not sure what you mean. Maybe it's just my biases, but I don't think most people would be against fake OnlyFans performers or AI porn with 100% fake personas. But generating porn of real people without their consent, let alone of children... Yikes, it gets problematic fast.
- irrational 3y agoWait, are they talking about porn of real people (much less children)? My assumption was they were talking about 100% AI generated people where any similarity to real people was purely coincidental. The article even says "Now, certain corners of the internet are inundated with these explicit images of women who don’t exist".
- nickthegreek 3y agoIt is mostly celebs/influencers who are deepfaked into porn. That's where the money is. But it has also happened at schools where someone does it another student/teacher and passes it around.
- irrational 3y agoI don't know if it is true that "that's where the money is" (some of the people quoted in the article are making a whole lot more money that I do at my six-figure tech job). But deepfakes of celebs or students is not what the article is about.