3 ms·
> calling it open source when it is not At first please define "open source". 1. Do you use this term as an alias for "The Open Source Definition" [0] as pres
by pbasista 3y ago
> calling it open source when it is not
At first please define "open source".
1. Do you use this term as an alias for "The Open Source Definition" [0] as presented by the Open Source Initiative? In such case, the Grayjay project's license seems to not meet this definition.
2. Do you use it in a more general sense to mean any software whose source code is publicly available? In such case, the Grayjay project fully meets this definition.
[0] https://opensource.org/osd/ https://opensource.org/osd/
I would be very cautious to assume that the term "open source" must always and in all contexts be interpreted as having the meaning described by the definition 1.