I think the larger point is that access is controlled by a single point of failure, and that single point of failure is exceedingly unreliable these days. We w

I think the larger point is that access is controlled by a single point of failure, and that single point of failure is exceedingly unreliable these days. We would need an organization, not an individual, in control and that organization would have to be truly dedicated to net neutrality. Not dedicated to net neutrality when it serves them and their friends, or net neutrality as an empty marketing slogan, but actual real net neutrality. (Plus, your "correction" doesn't even come slide to covering all the issues that have been experienced, and the correction itself needs a few layers of correction, but that's all beside the main point.)