3 ms·
so... uh... you didn't register google.com fast enough and now you want to have a discussion about how it's really owned by everyone and google should be paying
by dingosity 3y ago
so... uh... you didn't register google.com fast enough and now you want to have a discussion about how it's really owned by everyone and google should be paying rent to you?
i'm actually not trying to be a snot about this, it's just the extreme version of what i view geoism applied to domain names would end up as. if you had a link to an online discussion, that would be cool. probably out of scope for this post, but still sort of interesting.
- keiferski 3y agoWell, I'm no expert on Georgism, but the idea is that it incentivizes landowners to either sell or develop the land. So, for domain names, the idea would be similar: determine (in some way, to be determined) when a domain isn't being used, and then charge a fee that prevents squatting.
- xboxnolifes 3y agoA big part of Georgian is that land value can be impacted by nearby land development. Domains do not have nearby neighbors. At best, it gains some coincidental value by sharing a name with some shortlived fad. That being said, you wouldn't look for squatting and then charge a fee. You would evaluate every domain name and change a fee accordingly. Even non-squatted land can be underdeveloped.