3 ms·
Why is the FCC not just telling these companies what their robocall mitigation procedures should be, and how they are going to be measured and enforced? I under
by karaterobot 3y ago
Why is the FCC not just telling these companies what their robocall mitigation procedures should be, and how they are going to be measured and enforced? I understand that it would be more nimble to let well-meaning companies come up with scrappy solutions. Based on the lengthy timeline, I don't believe nimbleness is what they're going for, and based on these obviously bogus submissions, I'm not convinced the companies are well-meaning. Given this, maybe a firmer hand would be more effective.
- abduhl 3y agoPermitting companies to come up with their own plan means that they can be hit later if the plan is insufficient. A company that implements a government solution exactly has no liability - they’ve complied with the law. A company whose policy is deficient (because it didn’t meet the law’s mandate) or who didn’t follow their own policy may have liability.
- jfim 3y agoThey already have asked them to implement STIR/SHAKEN, but you're right that those submissions are clearly bogus.