I agree that publishing methods, code or even reinventing products in an open context is valuable... it is what I thought was one of my main contributions while

I agree that publishing methods, code or even reinventing products in an open context is valuable... it is what I thought was one of my main contributions while at the academic institution. From what I can tell, they are struggling to pay people given the 3x base salary overhead at the academic institute. They haven't been pushing out free tools, haven't been demonstrating in new scenarios, etc. They continue to publish things that are in the open literature which work for corner cases. The company has expanded the generality of solutions, which they are not innovating on or publishing. I would also say they have more money than they can spend and have delayed projects over 2years because they don't have people to lead them (getting back to the personnel problem). I'm just disappointed in them as an academic institution, deliberately missing their own mission statement and refusing to cite publications before them, and feel the 3x overhead is a waste... at the very least they should pay their people better.