6 ms·

Undersea cables seem like a perfect target, how does a state even ensure their cables aren't damaged by bad actors?

• 2rsf 3y ago
  Define "ensure", you can easily damage any cable undersea or not and if anything under sea ones are harder to get to.
  • rightbyte 3y ago
    You can drag an anchor after your boat and damage them. They are marked on the map to avoid such damages. It is a quite common accident.
  • tutfbhuf 3y ago
    > under sea ones are harder to get to At least not for state actors, or perhaps well-funded terrorist groups.
• RandomLensman 3y ago
  It can't.
  • deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
• toomuchtodo 3y ago
  You can bury them deeper after being laid in trenches created using undersea ploughs or water jets. They will always be vulnerable where they came to shore though, unless you're going to bury them deep all the way to the equipment hut on the shore. There is undersea concrete available for vulnerable paths (both articulated blocks and a mix that can be grouted and will set underwater), but I believe that likely draws more unwanted attention to the asset's route without providing much more protection. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/cyber-defense-across-the-ocean-floor-the-geopolitics-of-submarine-cable-security/ https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/re... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9tRmJLOCdg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9tRmJLOCdg
  • tivert 3y ago
    Those seem like a defense against accidental damage, but I don't see how burying a cable in a shallow trench or covering it with a few blocks of concrete will protect it from a "bad actor."
    • toomuchtodo 3y ago
      Absolutely, boils down to your threat model. If you are defending against a nation state actor, you are probably going to want to deploy underwater surveillance across the cable's length and station folks who can respond when someone nefarious shows up to chop chop. No security is absolute, you are either dissuading or slowing down an attacker based on their resources and available window of time. It's 42 miles/67km from Finland to Estonia across the Gulf of Finland, which does not seem challenging to defend vs cables crossing oceans. Sweden to Estonia is definitely a bit further. Finland and Estonia share a 1GW electrical interconnector (composed of two HVDC submarine cables, with a signed MOA for a third) Estonia is using to consume power from Finland's recently turned up nuclear generator. I am unaware if it is buried, but it is a strategic critical infra asset that likely requires defense. Its easy to overthink these problem spaces (imho), but I propose that Russia's current geopolitical posture adds an element of a wildcard necessitating the thought exercise. This infra can take months to build or repair, but only hours to cripple. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estlink https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estlink https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/EE?wind=false&solar=false https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/EE?wind=false&solar=fal... Example commercial system: https://electronica-submarina.com/protection-of-critical-infrastructures/ https://electronica-submarina.com/protection-of-critical-inf... Example US Navy military system SOSUS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOSUS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOSUS (which is suspected to be what detected the Titan submersible implosion)
    • sandworm101 3y ago
      The bad actors aren't down there with shovels and robots digging down into trenches. They are just like any other ship dragging an anchor across the bottom close to the cable. These cables are often deliberately laid far enough apart that, should they need to be serviced, they can be hauled up by dragging an anchor/hook until it snags the correct cable. So it is equally not difficult to attack a chosen cable with nothing more complex than an anchor, a long chain, and a handheld GPS.
• sandworm101 3y ago
  They don't. Damage happens all the time. There is an entire industry for repairing these cables. The answer is to have multiple redundant lines to redirect traffic onto other paths, which is largely what the internet does.
  • ugjka 3y ago
    Undersea cables get cut like 2 times a week anywhere around the world
• sidewndr46 3y ago
  Taiwan would love to know the answer to that as well!
• varjag 3y ago
  Naval patrols.
• sschueller 3y ago
  You don't need "bad actors" when you already have plenty of idiots in captain chairs doing damage by dragging their anchors where they aren't supposed to etc.
• Cthulhu_ 3y ago
  You can't; a while ago, there were Russian ships hovering near an important undersea cable (iirc between Ireland and the US). But since that's international waters, they can't do anything. I'm 99% sure that all the cables have been identified and if the order is given, they will be cut. Along with all other infrastructure.
  • petre 3y ago
    Yes you van. Surveillance equipment, remotely activated tamper explosives, patrols, etc.
• rjzzleep 3y ago
  Up until now there were silent rules of engagement of not touching this sort of infrastructure. All that probably went out the window with the NS2 bombing, but it's still doubtful that Russia would have anything to do with it. They've been meticulously avoiding escalation with any NATO country. Even when Lithuania tried to block Kaliningrad they solved it through diplomacy.
  • serpix 3y ago
    Russia does not do diplomacy. They lie, deny and threaten.
  • mastax 3y ago
    > They've been meticulously avoiding escalation with any NATO country. Except for the constant threats of nuclear Armageddon, the sabotage of the Bulgarian munitions factory, ramming into a US drone over the Black Sea, shooting a missile at a British jet over the Black Sea, threatening to invade Gotland, threatening to invade Poland, violating Finnish, Swedish, and Norwegian airspace. I’m probably forgetting some things, it’s been a long war.
• deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]